revolution kriminal
RK-X

Últimos miembros

AnludehanbThomascesCkmartkarDriverbubYlviartagNo name
AYUDA A CRECER VOTANDO
        ¡Haz click y Vota este sitio en TOP-WEBS.com!!

DIRECTORIO DE WEBS:
Círculo Amigos ChiliDirectorio Webs / Blog

Buzzear Perú

AFILIADOS:
Create your own banner at mybannermaker.com!
Tutoriales ocito
  
   

QUE OPINAS DE MI PAGINA.

Muy Buena
Regular 
No Regreso


Si buscas hosting web, dominios web, correos empresariales o crear páginas web gratis, ingresa a PaginaMX
Por otro lado, si buscas crear códigos qr online ingresa al Creador de Códigos QR más potente que existe


Libro de Visitas

Anonymous

Jacobfogma

27 Jan 2025 - 12:34 pm

https://www.pravoslavieug.ru — Посетите официальный сайт pravoslavieug для подробной информации.

Anonymous

Lavillodova

27 Jan 2025 - 12:27 pm

zika virus zikv zikasph2015 nonstructural protein 1 zika-ns1 natural gene orf cdna clone expression plasmid - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед
Tegs: t-butyl 1,8-dioxa-4,11-diazaspiro 5.6 dodecane-4-carboxylate - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед
potassium cyclopentylmethyltrifluoroborate - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед
c- 3-methyl-benzo d isoxazol-5-yl -methylamine hydrochloride - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед

sars-cov-2 2019-ncov nucleoprotein gene orf cdna clone expression plasmid, c-ofpspark tag codon optimized - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед https://chimmed.ru/products/sars-cov-2-2019-ncov-nucleoprotein-gene-orf-cdna-clone-expression-plasmid-c-ofpspark-tag-codon-optimized-id=1657148

Anonymous

Lavillodova

27 Jan 2025 - 12:27 pm

chikungunya virus chikv strain sl-ck1 e1 glycoprotein gene orf cdna clone expression plasmid codon optimized - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед
Tegs: 2-bromo-5-fluorophenyl hydrazine - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед
azepan-1-yl piperidin-3-yl methanone hydrochloride - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед
1-bromo-3- prop-2-yn-1-yloxy benzene - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед

dengue virus 3 denv-3 strain h87 capsid protein gene orf cdna clone expression plasmid, c-flag tag - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед https://chimmed.ru/products/dengue-virus-3-denv-3-strain-h87-capsid-protein-gene-orf-cdna-clone-expression-plasmid-c-flag-tag-id=1657138

Anonymous

Lavillodova

27 Jan 2025 - 12:26 pm

[url=https://chimmed.ru/products/human-emc4-tmem85-gene-orf-cdna-clone-expression-plasmid-c-ha-tag-id=1657361]human emc4 tmem85 gene orf cdna clone expression plasmid, c-ha tag - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед [/url]
Tegs: [u]3-bromo-2-butoxy-6-fluorobenzaldehyde; - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед [/u]
[i]2-bromo-6-fluoro-3-methoxyphenyl methanol; - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед [/i]
[b]tert-butyl 2,6-dichloro-4- trifluoromethyl benzoate; - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед [/b]

human znhit1 gene orf cdna clone expression plasmid, n-myc tag - купить онлайн в интернет-магазине химмед https://chimmed.ru/products/human-znhit1-gene-orf-cdna-clone-expression-plasmid-n-myc-tag-id=1657362

Anonymous

Hermanron

27 Jan 2025 - 12:19 pm

A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
кракен

At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.

As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken сайт
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.

Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.

The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.

And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.

Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.

It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.

Anonymous

Jerometon

27 Jan 2025 - 11:31 am

The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
kraken магазин

Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kra27 cc
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?

According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Anonymous

Dannylon

27 Jan 2025 - 11:30 am

A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
kraken marketplace

At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.

As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra26c.cc
Џлощадка кракен
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.

Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.

The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.

And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.

Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.

It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.

Anonymous

Miltonhot

27 Jan 2025 - 10:20 am

Understanding Venus Protocol: Your Gateway to DeFi
Venus Protocol has carved a niche in the fast-paced DeFi landscape by offering a one-stop solution for decentralized finance activities. Whether you're interested in lending, borrowing, or yield farming, Venus provides secure and scalable services on the blockchain.
venus io
Why Choose Venus Protocol?
The Venus Protocol stands out because:

It operates on the Binance Smart Chain, ensuring fast and cost-effective transactions.
It offers a decentralized lending platform that allows users to earn interest by supplying assets.
The protocol enables borrowing against crypto collateral without the need for a trusted counterparty.
It supports a wide range of crypto assets, providing higher liquidity and flexibility.
Key Features of Venus Protocol
Lending and Borrowing
Venus Protocol facilitates decentralized lending and borrowing with minimal fees, supported by a robust risk management framework. Users can seamlessly supply assets to the protocol and earn interest, or borrow by simply collateralizing their holdings.

Automated Yield Farming
Maximize your returns with Venus Protocol's yield farming opportunities. By leveraging your assets, you can participate in governance and earn rewards in the form of XVS, Venus Protocol's native token.

Multi-Asset Support
The platform supports numerous cryptocurrencies, enabling diverse investment strategies and providing a convenient way to gain returns on multiple asset classes.

Getting Started with Venus Protocol
Start your DeFi journey with Venus Protocol by following these steps:

Create a Wallet: Use a compatible wallet like Metamask or Trust Wallet to interface with Venus.
Fund Your Wallet: Transfer crypto assets to your wallet to engage with the Venus Protocol.
Connect and Start Earning: Connect your wallet to the Venus platform and start supplying or borrowing assets.
Venus Protocol is your trusted partner in the decentralized financial ecosystem. With its advanced features and strong community support, it simplifies DeFi for everyone from beginners to seasoned users. Embrace the future of finance with confidence and start exploring the possibilities at .

Anonymous

Josephjet

27 Jan 2025 - 09:43 am

The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
kraken onion

Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?

According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Anonymous

Angelsix

27 Jan 2025 - 09:06 am

https://www.skikursk.ru/ — Место, где мечты о кухне становятся реальностью.

Siéntete a gusto de dejarnos un mensaje en nuestro libro de visitas:

Tu nombre o Ingresar

Tu dirección de correo (no se mostrará)

¿De qué color es el pasto? (chequeo de seguridad)

Mensaje *

© 2025 revolution kriminal

2390417